Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

With any global term/movement there will be variations, but it generally started with support for maintaining monarchy and aristocracy.


2 points to make on that:

1) "Conservatism" these days would arguably be a US phenomenon as leading democracy in the Anglophone world. They certainly didn't get started supporting a monarchy.

2) And it is really interesting to note that, while I think monarchies are stupid, it was a remarkably good strategy. As far as I know (my history might be about to betray me) the UK didn't have an equivalent of the Terror after the French revolution or the period where the French killed off people like Lavoisier. To say nothing of the debacles in places like Russia (Communists) or Germany (Nazis) when they moved away from monarchism.

The UK probably should get rid of the King; but in hindsight a slow transition is arguably the cleverer path. It is a complex topic; the aristocrats in Europe are systematically underwhelming.


Italy and Spain kept their king while being a fascist and sort-of-fascist country respectively, so I’m not sure the theory is correct.

The UK didn’t have the Terror, but afaik it did have at least a civil war because of the monarchy, a few centuries ago.

Rather than the monarchy in itself, I suspect it’s the monarch(s) that make it or break it…


>The UK didn’t have the Terror, but afaik it did have at least a civil war because of the monarchy, a few centuries ago.

Cromwell.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Cromwell

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_English_Civil_War

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_English_Civil_War


Yeah, ask an English catholic…




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: