> Acknowledgment. I first read of the possibility of such a Trojan horse in an Air Force critique [4] of the security of an early implementation of Multics. I cannot find a more specific reference to this document. I would appreciate it if anyone who can supply this reference would let me know.
I'm not sure it is fair to claim that the Gov is behind the white paper, in that paying for a study is different than a program to develop malicious code.
> Acknowledgment. I first read of the possibility of such a Trojan horse in an Air Force critique [4] of the security of an early implementation of Multics. I cannot find a more specific reference to this document. I would appreciate it if anyone who can supply this reference would let me know.
ofc the US Gov was behind this. Incredible.
[0]: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/358198.358210