Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

“ New people buy them for a fraction of even the current price, and redevelop them. Or nobody buys them, and we get an empty lot”

If no one truly buys them, you don’t get an empty lot. You get abandoned, dilapidated buildings and all the associated social/environmental problems that comes with that.



Or the city could just invoke eminent domain, buy it at a very low price if the owner can’t demonstrate it having a high market price, restore the building and democratically choose an equitable process to rent it or sell it, hopefully favoring existing citizens.

But of course, we’d have to be a lot more aggressive about invoking eminent domain for this to be effective. To that end, it would make sense to also establish policies ensuring it’s easy to invoke it fairly and transparently - ie, easily allowing other parties to bid against the city for higher prices in cases where eminent domain is to be used this way (stipulating that those parties also take measures to restore the building, etc).


Your city will rather go bankrupt. Just take Detroit as a guide.


That sounds like privatizing the losses and socializing the profits and we just can’t have that here in the good ol’ US of A /s




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: