Humans can measure feelings, computers can't. Therefore I can say if ChatGPT doesn't have enough feeling but it can never do the inverse to me.

That feels simplistic, but we're dealing with fundamentally human concepts. I see absolutely no reason to work under the assumption that computer programs are somehow in the same domain as human thought, which is what a lot of people (you) are saying.

The goal should not be to demonstrate ChatGPT and Humans are different, because to me that is obvious and should be the starting point. Rather we should do the inverse, show that ChatGPT is indistinguishable from a person, as measured by Humans. And then, maybe, we can consider granting this computer program human rights like the right to use copyrightable media in a transformative way.

Ah, but that is really hard to do. So the AI tech bros don't do it, and instead work in the opposite direction.