Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No. You're wrong about this. You cannot simply reduce human intelligence to this definition and also be correct.


Why?

Frankly, based on a looot of introspection and messing around with altered states of consciousness, it feels pretty on point and lines up with how I see my brain working.


Because...?


For the same reason you can't reduce a human to simply a bag of atoms and expect to understand the person.


But humans are a specific type of a bag of atoms, and humans do (mostly) understand what they say and do, so that's not a legitimate argument against the reducibility of "understanding" to a such a bag of atoms (or specific kind of next token prediction for LLMs).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: