I don't know why the EFF keeps pushing this line, it's like flogging a dead horse. Evidence alone suggests that so few people care about DRM or about copyright law in general that the situation isn't going to change in favor of consumers in the foreseeable future.
Arguments over copyright and digital versions of works have raged for over 40 years and all that's happened is that copyright holders have gained even more power over copyright through tightened laws, DRM and through techniques such as them deliberately destroying or withdrawing digital copies.
It's simple really, if users cared enough the laws would have been changed by now—and they haven't except to get tighter.
For myself, I don't have or use any DRM-protected works. In fact, I've removed or disabled the DRM capability on my computers.
Arguments over copyright and digital versions of works have raged for over 40 years and all that's happened is that copyright holders have gained even more power over copyright through tightened laws, DRM and through techniques such as them deliberately destroying or withdrawing digital copies.
It's simple really, if users cared enough the laws would have been changed by now—and they haven't except to get tighter.
For myself, I don't have or use any DRM-protected works. In fact, I've removed or disabled the DRM capability on my computers.