Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I agree with this completely.

A small but important suggested addition: if it's someone who's funeral you would go to, tell that person now what they mean to you. Then they can hear it while they are still alive.

It is not a given that you will have enough time to tell them later.



sometimes, not going to the funeral is the message to be said and saying it to them "now" is considered rude. clearly, the message of not attending is being said to others not to the person, but you get the gist


The person died, what message can you want to send to a dead person. He/She is dead. He can't hear it. But you can forgive and believe me, feel better about whatever happened that made you want to send a message that would never be received.


> what message can you want to send to a dead person

you ask me that after I said "clearly, the message of not attending is being said to others not to the person, but you get the gist"

so clearly, you didn't get the gist. not attending says something to the other friends/family that did attend. the knee jerk reaction is "what an asshole to not attend" typically followed by "I wonder what happened that would make them not attend". then the gossiping begins and the person sending the message smiles a wry smile


Yeah, I got that. It is just that I think it is now pointless. Like, he/she is dead.


why do you keep referring to the dead person like that's the point of the not going? you're sending a message to those that do go by not going. the subject of the message is the deceased not the recipient.


Ah. I thought you had a beef with the dead.

Ok. I can respect that.

It is just that as I was thinking the dead was the target, it would be better to make sure you get whatever retribution while he is alive.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: