I'm not interested in, nor do I own, a Tesla. I don't directly own stocks in Tesla. My employment is in no way related to Tesla, but it is in finding corner cases for real world problems.
It's difficult to address your response, since your interpretation of my question is so misaligned with where my question was coming from.
> What I'm saying is that Tesla's FSD implementation should not be used on public roads, as it currently stands.
This is the catch 22 that my questions were framed around.
Note that Waymo (1 per 2.7M) [1] and Tesla (1 per 6M) [2] have significantly lower accident rates than bare humans (1 per 0.36M), with FSD having 2x lower that Wayme. This suggests that running as is will prevent accidents.
It's difficult to address your response, since your interpretation of my question is so misaligned with where my question was coming from.
> What I'm saying is that Tesla's FSD implementation should not be used on public roads, as it currently stands.
This is the catch 22 that my questions were framed around.
Note that Waymo (1 per 2.7M) [1] and Tesla (1 per 6M) [2] have significantly lower accident rates than bare humans (1 per 0.36M), with FSD having 2x lower that Wayme. This suggests that running as is will prevent accidents.
[1] https://theavindustry.org/resources/blog/waymo-reduces-crash...
[2] https://www.tesla.com/VehicleSafetyReport (this comparison may not be exactly equal)