Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So, the formula is really about making any integer with three 2s, but historical precedent calls the game with four 2s more interesting, so the (stronger) result is monkey-patched by replacing a 2 with sqrt(2+2).


Why not use 3 2’s to make n + 2 or n - 2? That’s a lot easier than making a subscript so complicated.

This is the Curse of Knowledge. OP stared too long into the abyss.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: