Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're mischaracterising "not wanting to overpay" and "getting something you need in return for what you have in excess" as "greed".

It's a pointless conversation if you're willing to do that. You're just changing definitions before arguing them.



I will allow for sake of argument then trading for needs to be excepted. Under your definition it would also implode, just not fully destruct.


Trading for wants is no different to trading for needs from a capitalism perspective. It just removes the need for a central bureaucracy that decides what counts as a need.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: