btrfs does volumes, it should also do volume encryption, why have an unnecessary... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		commandersaki 10 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Bcachefs may be headed out of the kernel btrfs does volumes, it should also do volume encryption, why have an unnecessary layer inbetween?

int_19h 10 months ago [–]

I'm not saying it wouldn't be nice to have, but given that the workaround is there, it doesn't sound like something that should contribute to btrfs being a "suitable replacement for 90% of cases".

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact