Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

People often talk about supply and demand until this subject comes up. “How can you stand to live somewhere so expensive?” “Because it’s so nice that many people want to live here.” “Impossible!”

The high COL is proof that people enjoy it and are voting with their wallets. It’s not as though everyone here is ignorant of the existence of Oklahoma. I’ve lived there-ish. I pay extra not to have to anymore.



The demand is due to high paying jobs in the area not because San Fran is a nice place to live (lmao). The massive outflux due to COVID WFH is proof.


So the open market voted and decided that the area can support a high COL, but we'll choose every explanation other than that people want to live here.


People do want to live there because... of... jobs. How is this hard to understand LOL.

You really think if high paying jobs were more spread out we'd see this insane Calhoun-like concentration of people in geographically tiny areas?


Now, why are the jobs there? Is it because everyone wants to pay tons more for housing, or is it because people with higher incomes are willing to pay for better living conditions and everyone else is pulled along? Tech didn’t used to be anywhere near this concentrated but over the decades people moved out of declining cities and that produced the current hyper-concentration. That cycle is brutal - you have cities like Rochester which have a lot of comparatively cheap real estate but until the senior management want to live there, they won’t have enough businesses for any skilled workers not to think they’d be screwed if their current employment changes because there aren’t many alternatives.


Yes, I think what it comes down to is its more efficient for companies because of that positive feedback network effect.

WFH could have changed that equation and made life better for everyone. Too bad we can't have nice things.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: