> Was it hailed as a beautiful language when it came out? Why not?
Short-sightedness? Confusion between JS and the DOM API? I don't see why you're bringing up "when it came out" either.
> "Beautiful if you know it" know also means "this is the only thing I know"
I don't see how that follows either.
I said that because many developers have a prejudiced impression of JS from the ie/netscape/image rollover days when it was hastily dismissed as a toy. If you spend some time looking at it seriously you can appreciate just how good "the good parts" are.
Short-sightedness? Confusion between JS and the DOM API? I don't see why you're bringing up "when it came out" either.
> "Beautiful if you know it" know also means "this is the only thing I know"
I don't see how that follows either.
I said that because many developers have a prejudiced impression of JS from the ie/netscape/image rollover days when it was hastily dismissed as a toy. If you spend some time looking at it seriously you can appreciate just how good "the good parts" are.