Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A PhD holder should be coming in under O-1.


A PhD comes as a student with F1 student visa that expires the day of their graduation.

O1 is unlikely to be granted to a student who has not graduated yet. What are they going to show for evidence? Manuscripts in preparation? Or class grades?


> What are they going to show for evidence?

I guess they wouldn't have much to show for evidence. Which is exactly why they would be correctly classified as not being a specialist, and therefore undeserving on an O-1 visa.

These visas are not meant to allow company to hire underpaid employees that quite literally just graduated.


A company conducts a technical interview to assess a candidate. Their public record is not their only criterion of hiring. USCIS relies exclusively on public record (and maybe recommendation letters)


How many businesses have ever found a fresh graduate to be provably essential?


Name one person who is provably essential to a company.


Jensen Huang


Nvidia will continue to exist even if JH disappears today.

All companies of that size have succession plans. See Apple and Alibaba.


That’s my point. The problem you’ve raised doesn’t really exist.


:facepalm:




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: