You're saying that the UK's porn laws are "actively attacking the sovereignty" of the US in a way that is comparable to breaking a military alliance. Do I have that right?
Further, you're implying this activity is NOT something that the US has historically and regularly done to other countries, including its allies in NATO?
Of course I am. A military alliance is contingent on the other party remaining an ally. Even Democrats would expect NATO to be dissolved if by some shenanigans Putin was elected PM.
That the US abuses it's position as the primary military power on earth to violate other nation's sovereignty is wrong and might matter "in the final calculus" but doesn't change how wrong this UK action is in isolation. It does bring up another absurdity particular to interactions between the US and UK which is that the US extended an insane amount of courtesy of not "finishing the job" once it was the predominant world power.
> It does bring up another absurdity particular to interactions between the US and UK which is that the US extended an insane amount of courtesy of not "finishing the job" once it was the predominant world power.
I don’t think that’s courtesy. I think that’s just realizing how useless and hard fighting a cross-atlantic war is.
Further, you're implying this activity is NOT something that the US has historically and regularly done to other countries, including its allies in NATO?