$6.2 billion which are prob to be invested in amazon to be invested in the startup to be invested in amazon, so I would not assume such an amount actually implies the size where this would be surprising.
There is pretty concrete published data that shows trends in less hiring for roles that are easily replaced by AI such as content writers and front-end developers
Personally I let go a developer I was using because I only had them around for front end work and now I'm much more productive just doing that with Claude Code directly
So the returns for the average business are largely due to less employee and contractors spending
> There is pretty concrete published data that shows trends in less hiring
Is there any concrete evidence that lower hiring is due to AI, and not due to some other factor - such as a stalling economy? I suspect AI growth is the only thing currently staving off a full-blown recession.
Have you given thought to the fact that there is an overlap between "jobs easily replaced by AI" and "jobs that are easy to consolidate into existing roles", or even "non-essential jobs"?
> jobs that are easy to consolidate into existing roles
I think you are on to something here. AI is what gives people the ability to consolidate many roles into one.
Like in my example, when I fired my front-end developer, I now can easily do that task.
Or, a marketing generalist can now create blog posts using ChatGPT instead of needing to also have a content writer
To your point about "non-essential": "Front-end development" is not necessarily something I would consider non-essential, but maybe "front-end developer" is now. Something to think about
If you're vibe coding a front end, you're going to run into issues with technical debt eventually, so that's a very short sighted way to handle things.
Or if you do have the technical skill for front-end work, you could have done it without the AI.
I do doubt this, however, because AI assisted programming does not increase productivity for skilled workers as much according to studies.
I've been programming for well over a decade, but as a founder I wear many different hats so I had a front end developer to help take some of the load off.
But AI coding got to the point where, for me personally, it took less of my own time and effort to work directly with the AI (Claude Code) to do the front-end tasks required compared to working with the developer, reviewing their code, etc.
I'm not "vibe coding" or adding technical debt.
> you could have done it without the AI.
Technically anyone could do anything, but there are finite things in this world like the number of hours in a day lol
> according to studies.
Great, I don't care about the "studies". I'm talking about how things work for me personally in the real world and giving a concrete example of how AI spend has replaced an employee but you are welcome to ignore that
Also, it should be noted that in studies, the conclusions are typically based on an average or median, so some people will see a benefit, and some people won't... and that will be based on a number of factors
There is money going in, but not as much as what these valuations and investments imply. The numbers are inflated and that's common knowledge by this point.
