Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How is nuking Japan different from nuking Korea? Everybody agrees that forcing Japan to surrender with nukes was much better for everyone involved than a ground invasion.




When Japan was bombed, nobody else in the world had nuclear weapons, the US only had 2, and there were only a handful of people outside of the US seriously researching nuclear weapons and were still years away from a test. By 1950 the USSR had working nuclear bombs, had proven so with a nuclear test, and a dozen other countries had started their own nuclear weapons programs.

It's different almost by definition?

Because it was a once (twice!) off the impact and significance of it is amplified.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: