Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't know, and I admit I was operating under that assumption.

But is that not the goal? Is there some kind of discrimination which is "good", and should go on?





I think you're raising the paradox of tolerance.

Should I accept technically perfect PRs if they contain comments and messages with hate speak?


There is no paradox of tolerance. This is a social contract, once you break it you are not entitled to it, simple. Also speech, not speak.

The issue arises when people disagree on what reality is.

When most Americans are running on pure ideology and a (quite unearned imho) sense of moral certainty and superiority, they assume their worldview is the objectively correct one, and everyone who disagrees with them is "a bigot."

Both sides of our divide have some psychotic people who do things like murdering people. But absent actually harmful acts like that, disagreeing with you doesn't make someone intolerant. It could be that your framing is wrong, or that there isn't one black-and-white objective universal right way of framing an issue.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: