Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Officers were instructed to screen for those "who advocate for, aid, or support designated foreign terrorists and other threats to national security; or who perpetrate unlawful anti-Semitic harassment or violence"."

Okay, that's your job then. It's not mine or anyone else's job to just hand everything over.





That's like saying aircraft inspections is the FAA's job and it's not Boeing's job "to just hand everything over." Entering into a country's borders is a privilege and you submit to an inspection in doing so. One of the very first things the American founding fathers did in 1789 was to create a customs service to perform border inspections: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Customs_Service.

One has quite a bit more to do with privacy. And stifling free speech.

> perpetrate unlawful anti-Semitic harassment

Interesting that threats to national security and "antisemitism" are put on an equal footing and clearly above everything else; also makes me wonder what is "unlawful antisemitic harassment"- the US considers every speech lawful as far as I understand. Or, if some speech is indeed unlawful, is it going to matter only if that speech is against Jews or Israel?


[flagged]


It's fair to be very loud (and even very disruptive, although that hardly applies to this case) when protesting against a genocide. That's what democracy is for, sorry that it hurts the feelings of the supporters of a country whose prime minister is wanted for crimes against humanity.

Which antisemitic terrorist organization? The one giving Fuentes mainstream coverage?

I don't know what Fuentes is. I am talking about Hamas, I thought that was obvious.

There is an even louder and more disruptive group of people who are proudly in support of genocide and are funding a majority of US politicians.

Sure but they'll make your day extremely unpleasant before deporting you or if a USC letting you in.

A few things that's happened to me as a citizen after invoking right to remain silent to CBP

1) Told I could not enter the country. Held up for 3-24 hours in holding areas. Officials come in and claim they will revoke my passport under "national security"-esque grounds. Lots of bluffing and huffing and puffing. Diesel therapy of being made to go back and forth to interrogating officers and then constantly prodded to be deprived of sleep. After a few shift rotations no one is left that know why you were being fucked with so you then [hopefully] get let go.

2) Dogs constantly come in, none of them alert. Eventually they get tired of finding nothing and write up a fraudulent affadavit for a warrant claiming one alerted anyway. Strip searched, hands cuffed and feet chained, imprisoned in a holding cell with people you can't speak the language of, diesel therapy again in prisoner van driven all over the state. Taken to two different private hospitals where CBP officers claim there is drugs up my ass. Cursed and touched without consent by private hospital staff (oh you can complain to the board as I did, lol, the state board just claims since CBP told them to their license isn't in jeopardy). Hospital staff rack up bills, which are sent to me privately and go to collections. Medical records state nothing was found but they "Think I'm packing drugs" anyway despite absolutely no medical evidence.

Have fun!


Wait what did I just read? This sounds horrible and pure evil and not worthy of america.

My sympathies are with you!


> My sympathies are with you!

Is there anything you can do about it?


What do you expect from them? Unless saxenaabhi is code for "US CBP Commissioner" or some position of an equivalent power, there is very little that an HN user can do about it at this point.

"What can I do alone?!", said 100m+ people.

I'm not an American, but I'm doubtful there's 100 millions Americans out there who think this is wrong, let alone to an extent where they would be willing to do anything about it. If you look at it in terms of scenarios that can actually happen, the US has already decided about a year ago - now they and the rest of the world are along for the ride. Something truly momentous would have to happen now for an agency as powerful as the CBP to change course, barring an unlikely sudden mood change from up top.

That's right. I always have to remind myself that all that's happening in the US is indeed the true will of American people.

What do you mean "not worthy of America"? It is America.

Friendly reminder not to believe everything you read online.

Yeah this is why I don't talk about it often. Because no one but my family believe it, and only after I showed them the warrant and medical records.

Fact is hardly anyone believes these things until it happens to them, because they don't want to believe we live in such a dystopia.


You wrote:

> A few things that's happened to me as a citizen after invoking right to remain silent to CBP

What happened that caused you to “invoke your right to remain silent”? When you enter a country, including the US, you are asked some pretty standard questions that would be weird to refuse to answer.

What question did you not want to answer?


I answered the questions on what I had to declare and anything regarding my identity and citizenship, along with presenting my passport. I also will answer the question to which countries I've been to, although I know of no requirement to do so. I will answer the question about whether I have currency and instruments exceeding $10,000. Other than that I will not answer, nor am I aware of any requirement to do so.

This caused me to be fucked with mercilessly for about 10 years. Eventually I was investigated by an HSI officer who seems to have determined I'm just a crazy libertarian or something, now I tend not to get held up terribly long.

Edit: I have tried to answer below questions but it appears I cannot post any more messages until a certain times elapses. Below commenter has repeatedly shifted his attack, it is clear only goal is to shift and attack my message through a series of moving questions that keep moving the goalposts. 'This' did not happen 10 years ago, some of the events happened 10 years ago, some of them significantly more recent, and I have pretty much fully defined what sort of questions were answered. But of course it's pointless to even reply such commenters as I know from experience they are only going to dig endlessly until a magic 'gotcha' is found as to why I deserve it.


Ok, so you still don’t say which specific question you refused to answer.

> This caused me to be fucked with mercilessly for about 10 years.

And this happened 10 years ago? I do not see how that connects to discussion of the current tightening of immigration rules, to be honest.


To clarify: CBP is Canadian Border Patrol and you are a Canadian citizen re-entering Canada when this happened?


More likely US Customs & Border Protection

Yeah, it was confusing. I my circles the US one is known as "BP" and Canadian is "CBP". It makes more sense that they were talking about the Mexican border in retrospect given some other cues.

You must be misremembering, or maybe the your social circle mixed up the two by accident, which then became established. The Canadian border agency is never called CBP, because the actual name of the agency is CBSA. CBP always refers to the US agency.

We're on the US side so we probably don't care. Never heard it called CBSA or the US one called CBP, either.

Customs and Border Protection in the USA

A tourist (to any country) has no right to enter. If you don't cooperate they can simply deny your entry.

Yes, but few other countries are as draconian about this as the US seems to want to be, and it is relevant to want to discuss how it will affect the US to make itself a less attractive place to travel to.

Try travel to Europe on an African passport…

I don't doubt there are worse countries/scenarios. We're dealing specifically though with the downward slide of the U.S.

I have in-laws who do that regularly. I'm aware there are plenty of complications with that. I still stand by what I wrote.

> there are plenty of complications with that

What are some of the complications?


Do you have an actual point that doesn't involve me divulging private information of people who are not part of this conversation? My identity is on my profile; identifying the people in question would be rather easy.

If what you're suggesting is that the US is not being more draconian than most, you're free to make an actual claim about how.

I'll note that this article is about people eligible for the visa waiver program, which does not include any African countries - travelling to the US from African countries is also far more draconian than what is outlined in the article, so it's unclear why you think the comparison is relevant.


For one: the US is way more permissive than the EU when it comes to visa duration.

Common to get a 10 year US visa. Schengen visa? For the duration of your visit (for which you have to have bought plane tickets and accommodation before showing up for a visa appointment). The EU also charges pretty hefty fees for a Schengen visa, which I view as a racket and/or xenophobia.

Don’t even get me started on the requirement to hand over your passport at hotels in Europe!

My point is that characterizing the US as “more draconian than most” is quite far from reality, which is a lot more nuanced.


> Common to get a 10 year US visa. Schengen visa? For the duration of your visit

Both of these are possible. Neither are nearly that simple.

For starters the validity period depends on the country, and the type of visa, and since you mentioned Africa, applicants from the vast majority of African states are limited to single entry visas with 3 months validity for B-visas. A few can get 4-5 years, and a handful (I think Morocco, Botswana, South Africa) can get 10 years.

Given that, it's rather odd that you used specifically African countries as the basis for comparison and then pulled out 10 year duration.

On the other side, it is reasonably uncommon to be limited to just the stay for Schengen visas, though it can certainly happen, especially for applicants from poorer countries. And validity can be up to 5 years. But you certainly can

> The EU also charges pretty hefty fees for a Schengen visa, which I view as a racket and/or xenophobia.

The standard cost for a Schengen visa is 90 euros or 105 USD. If you've paid more that has been service fees to application centres, not the EU fees.

The application fee for a US B-visa is 185 USD, in addition there is an issuance fee for some countries, most of them African.


or try to travel to an islamic country with an Israeli stamp on your passport or an Israeli passport.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: