Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Of course, if you're taking up arms to resist/overthrow a government, then you should be entirely anticipating that the government will shoot back. Or shoot first.

If protest is approaching/crossing the line into insurgency, people need to seriously consider that they may be putting their life on the line. It's not a game.



I'm pretty sure that if people are taking up arms to resist their government, things have already gone far enough down that path that they feel their lives are in jeopardy.

Just this week there were [~~Catholic~~] PRIESTS who were advised to draw up their last will and testament if they were going to resist [~~ICE in Minneapolis~~] the government https://www.npr.org/2026/01/18/nx-s1-5678579/ice-clashes-new...

How can you think it's a "game'?

Edit - removed incorrect quantifiers


> Just this week there were Catholic PRIESTS who were advised to draw up their last will and testament if they were going to resist ICE in Minneapolis

Episcopal (the US branch of the Anglican Communion), not Catholic, and it wasn't conditioned on going to Minneapolis, it was a statement about the broad situation of the country and the times we are in and what was necessary for them, with events in Minneapolis as a signifier, but not a geographically isolated, contained condition.


Thanks for the feedback, you're right and I've (tried) to mark the incorrect stuff with what markdown would show as strikethroughs)


> How can you think it's a "game'?

Everything seems fueled by social media radicalisation, and the social media side of things is very much 'gameified', all about scoring likes/upvotes/followers (and earning real revenue) for pushing escalating outrage.


Which is VERY different to the discussion at hand.


Is it?

Good’s wife after yelling DRIVE BABY, DRIVE DRIVE and the fallout screamed at agents “Why are you using real bullets!”

These people seem to have thought it was a game.


She was unarmed when she was killed.


A vehicle can be just as deadly as a firearm. And vehicles had previously been used aggressively by the protestors.

There were claims (no idea if true) that the agent who fired the fatal shots had been dragged down the road and injured in a previous vehicle-based altercation.


If him being previously injured affected his mental state such that he needed to kill someone who was not presenting an immediate threat to life, he should not have been on duty.


[flagged]


None of those things are an immediate threat to life.

Spread your hate with someone else.


Hitting someone with your car is an immediate threat to life.

Stomp feet all you like, but she made all the bad decisions she could and seemed to think it was a game.


If anyone is wondering - yes I am stopping interacting with this individual who refuses to reply in good faith.


> Spread your hate with someone else.

> I am stopping interacting with this individual who refuses to reply in good faith.

Wild. I noticed that you didn’t dispute any of the facts about the incident, but will not relent on your incorrect claims of MURDER.


Every police agency and training in the world will clearly explain that a vehicle is absolutely considered a weapon.

A single rental truck in Nice France killed more people than any mass shooting in the USA, ever.


Show me where the car was being used as a dangerous weapon.


Well… she accelerated in drive with a federal agent in front of the vehicle, while ignoring other federal agents to stop and get out of the vehicle, he THEN drew his gun from the holster, she the hit him with that car.

Her mental state was clearly not peaceful or rational - while armed. If she had made better decisions she would be alive.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: