Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This company is part of the portfolio of a $trillion+ transnational corporation. The idea that we can't judge them, when they clearly have more resources than 99% of other companies on this planet, doesn't hold up to any scrutiny.

Why defend a company that clearly doesn't care about its customers and see them as a money spigot to suck dry?

 help



The OP clearly never says we can't judge them. He was speaking to how the uptime is measured. I'm not saying I agree or disgree with the OP but at least address the argument he's making.

You had an opportunity to use three or more nines in your comparison to other companies and you just left it on the table and went with two nines. ;p



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: