Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

you need to show how excluding people on the basis of skin colour makes things better.


Who is talking about skin colour here? I haven't mentioned this term a single time, instead I purposefully use the term inalienable characteristics because that covers more than just skin tone.

You're the one talking about excluding people based on skin colour, not me. That is after all what DEI ends up being: exclude those who are considered to be non-marginalised (in practice white and east-Asian, heterosexual, men) from the pool. Getting rid of DEI removes the inalienable characteristics filter so that everybody is allowed in again to compete on merit. Having a given skin tone is not a badge of merit, having achieved a given level of competence is.

Do you realise that you are the one who is turning this into a question of race and that you are the one who is willing to exclude people based on it? Read that Sowell quote again and realise you're the one he's talking about, whether you're a politico or not.


Oh yes, racial equality has famously been achieved in the US...


All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others

Read that book. If it is too long read a summary [1]. Learn.

No, it has not. Neither does it make sense to reduce the level of equality, hence the need to get rid of DEI and similar constructs.

[1] https://literarydevices.net/animal-farm/


it's impressive how you managed to read that book and completely miss the point.


May I suggest you read it again, carefully?


Yes you may. It's orthogonal to your being wrong.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: