Unless AI will allow people not work and keep their quality of life. Could be possible with total automation of everything.

Could also be possible today, but we chose a capitalistic system that leads to an increasing wealth gap. And now we're in a situation where the richest 1% own 50% of the wealth.

So, if we increase automation and the ownership structures stay the same, this inequality will get worse, not better.

It’s interesting, people talk about inequality and I definitely feel it myself – I see so many rich people around me. But I am in that 1%, just like many on this forum. At least according to https://dqydj.com/average-median-top-individual-income-perce... yet I still have to work for a living.

Too 1% income don't put you in the 1% richest as lots of people are rich because of inheritance, not income.

You might be in the 1% gloablly, but probably not in the country you are living in?

I'm 1% in US.

its reasonably well known that people thrive when they have a sense of purpose.

having your needs met without needing to do anything leads to disaster for mental health

This is my biggest concern. In the more distant future, I think people will lose themselves in VR worlds.

How will this ever be possible? Do you think it will ever be able to keep up with generations of people not working?

The cost will exponentially increase over time and the systen will eventually collapse.

You also won't be able to keep your 'quality of life', unless government housing and rationing is your quality.

I feel like the foolishness of communism isn't taught enough in schools and every generation has to dress it up with new technology.

> The cost will exponentially increase over time and the systen will eventually collapse.

From what I'm seeing in the numbers, the big problem of the coming century is population collapse. Maybe I'm just too much of a believer in the intermediate value theorem, but I'm sure there has to be a way to arrive at a society with a sustainable usage of resources.

Nope. If everything is totally automated, if ever, the gap between the rich and the poor will widen even more. Most people will live in misery while only a handful of people enjoy all the automation.

> Having a job that they dislike is far better than losing one because of AI whatever that means.

Is it really worse even if "whatever it means" is living in a post-scarcity society where everyone can shareel in the fruits of the AI's labor?

I'm not saying that's where this are necessarily going. But I am saying that that's what we should be aiming for, rather than trying to preserve the status quo.