> AI code assistants allow whole projects to be refactored and even rewritten in entirely different programming languages and software stacks in a few minutes, sometimes even with one-shot prompts. Most assistants even support creating and maintaining test suites with first-class support. Whatever you prompt, they do it.
> And here we are, expected to believe that these tools can't or don't follow best practices?
Uh they don't really. The contradiction you're seeing is actually fictional because that premise is wrong.
That just goes to show how far your experience goes. I have projects in my workspace to support the idea, and your baseless assertion rejecting the whole idea? What's more credible?
> The contradiction you're seeing is actually fictional because that premise is wrong.
Doubling down on baseless assertions means nothing.
As a dispassionate third party: your assertion is literally just as baseless unless you provide said base. It’s wild to shout down someone else when you yourself are doing the same thing.
> And here we are, expected to believe that these tools can't or don't follow best practices?
Uh they don't really. The contradiction you're seeing is actually fictional because that premise is wrong.