Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

AGI has always been expected to outperform humans or else what is the point of it?
 help



The point is replacing humans, and for that it only has to equal them at lower cost (including factors like not needing sleep and being easily clonable). The outperformance lies in the cost savings, not necessarily in the intelligence.

An AI does not have to be AGI to replace humans, that is whole another topic I think.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: