You can't do cost/benefit on subjective things which is not rally an issue for computers but how do you compare a 50$ toaster vs a 200$ toaster.

I generally agree, as there is a difference between a great car to drive at any price vs. a great car for the normal person.

Seems like a great car though - I'm sure it complicates things for its competitors in the same price class.

My intention was to distinguish between their product reviews, which are very useful, and their consumer protection initiatives. Many of these will cost a lot and may not justify the benefits. I don't think I've ever seen them make an argument which includes the cost of a government mandate that they favor.