I am glad David pointed this out. It may seem like a small thing, however what he brought up can be seen as an Out-of-integrity behavior as a positive phenomenal. And I am not talking about morality, good vs. bad. Think for a moment about the Law of Gravity: there is no such thing as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ gravity;
As economist Michael Jensen pointed out
Integrity as “what it takes for a person to be whole and complete....And an individual is whole and complete when their word is whole and complete, and their word is whole and complete when they honour their word."
And this law seems work just gravity for all human-beings (not just Google executive).
Out-of-integrity behavior has been pervasive, both on an organizational and an individual basis, and that attributed to the unworkabilities in the world.
More about Integrity a positive phenomenal can be read here:
As economist Michael Jensen pointed out
Integrity as “what it takes for a person to be whole and complete....And an individual is whole and complete when their word is whole and complete, and their word is whole and complete when they honour their word."
And this law seems work just gravity for all human-beings (not just Google executive).
Out-of-integrity behavior has been pervasive, both on an organizational and an individual basis, and that attributed to the unworkabilities in the world.
More about Integrity a positive phenomenal can be read here:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1511274