Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I disagree. Wikipedia links are very good, specially for informal discussions like this one.

- The content is readable by most people without having to have specialized knowledge on the subject.

- The content is open and reviewed by multiple people.

- You have links to the references. In this case there is a link to this NIH article. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667526/ But the content is more technical and harder to read for most people.



I said it wasn't authoritative, I said nothing about readability or openness, neither of which have anything to do with what is under discussion.

I can provide plenty of UK links which refer to Down's syndrome.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: