Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is that to be believed, in light of lack of evidence so far?


What evidence could they provide of this that would satisfy people?


At this point, anything more than completely nothing, nil, nada, would be an improvement. Whereas there is a parade of unsupported statements by state security officials that have been revealed, within a week or two, to have been a lie. The fact that the burden of proof seems to be heavy is not for no reason.


It might be an improvement, but it would not be enough - so what's the point?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: