I don't get this just like I don't get the bitcoin "hubs" or "wallets" or whatever they are.
Your crypto keys, like your bitcoins, are just small text files. They are nothing special at all and can be completely managed, and secured, on your own local systems.
There is nothing but fragility and loss down this road and people that really need security in their comms will not expose themselves to that fragility (just like smart folks probably weren't putting their bitcoins in third party "wallets").
It's about making these things easy to use for more people. For people who don't have the time / energy / desire to learn about the systems they use, in order to use them.
But then again, it's a bit like making democracy easier by having only one party on the ballot? That is to say: Making things easier in a way that undermines the whole point of why you should be doing it in the first place kinda defeats the purpose, doesn't it?
Yes, I hear that part of the pitch, but in my mind the people that have a need for the security that encrypted messaging provides will need to grasp it deeply enough to not need the handholding.
And conversely, the "consumers" that aren't compelled by strict requirements to understand how text files work don't need the security anyway.
Your crypto keys, like your bitcoins, are just small text files. They are nothing special at all and can be completely managed, and secured, on your own local systems.
There is nothing but fragility and loss down this road and people that really need security in their comms will not expose themselves to that fragility (just like smart folks probably weren't putting their bitcoins in third party "wallets").