There is a lot more to stopping an epidemic than creating the drug. You also need to be able to administer the drug--and in some of the areas worst-hit by the current outbreak, residents are suspicious (or actively hostile) to medical teams.

Ebola transmits through direct contact with bodily fluids, which means that basic measures of sanitation and hygiene can go a long way toward slowing its spread. If those cannot be achieved, distributing an expensive, delicate drug is not likely to be achievable either.

Antibody drugs are being made in bulk without too much difficulty. There are a number of RA-specific drugs on the market that are doing well, and at least one of them is grown in 6000-litre fermenters. Yeah, there might be problems getting this set up and approved, but the technology's been in place for a decade or two.

Do you have an actual suggestion about what should have been done differently or are you just trolling people who have a deadly virus?

In this context anybody in the west is likely to be wealthy enough to get this drug.

Of course if you living in Africa you are fucked, but what else is new.

To be fair, the ultra wealthy were already safe. It's pretty easy to avoid sick people (particularly sick people spewing blood) when you can just hang out on your island or on a large estate.

Or any estate, or literally anywhere that isn't Africa...

Or any room that lacks someone currently dying of Ebola or recently dead from Ebola. I'm pretty sure the only victims are caregivers and people who deal with the dead - it's not easy to catch.

And that the ones who refuse to listen to basic instructions will be less safe