Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So those 85 detectives and supervisors, formerly working on auto crime, now work on auto crime -- a subset of auto crime to be precise.

The grandparent's comment has merit. Government has stayed exactly the same size.



...while working on something with larger impact, apparently. Is the size of the government the only indicator of efficiency?


The point is that if previously they had, say, 85 people with 30 working on organized car theft rings and 55 on random single thefts; then a reasonable result of a tenfold decrease in random thefts would NOT be 80 people on organized car theft rings and 5 on random single thefts but instead 40 on the organized crime (if it has increased), 5 on the random thefts, and 40 people moved away from the car crime, either to something different within the police or laid off to make budget for other useful things such as medicine or public transportation.

Demand for various niches of gov't service will change, that's a given. When it's not enough, bad stuff is visible, voters complain and service gets increased. What happens when the demand falls, as it has in this case? We need an ability to reduce the size as well.


Fair point.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: