Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Attempting to blackmail the press if they challenge your company's PR?

Every major company does this, just not in the ham fisted way that Uber has done. Want NYT tech reporter to give positive reviews of Apple? Give him special access to newsworthy stories from inside, early access to devices, free gear, fly him out to special events and treat him like a prince. He gives an overly critical review? Take it all away. He'll have to hear from his friends at WSJ how great this year's event was, or how cool the devices are. They'll be special, he won't.



Surely you can see the difference between "loss of favorable treatment and perks" and "gross abuse of private data and anonymous slander"?

What you've described - while highly problematic - is a pretty big distance away from "blackmail".


I'm not saying I support it, I'm just pointing out that companies manipulate journalists all the time and incentivize them not to "challenge the company's PR" as the GP put it. Uber's threats were extreme and beyond what is tolerated outside of politics. They could have manipulated her much easier by giving her unlimited free Uber "to better evaluate the service".


Oh I agree that there's a huge problem in using incentives to manipulate journalists and coverage - but I do think the comparison is a bit stretched.

It's like comparing a hang glider to a jumbo jet. Sure, both are bad behavior and have some common motivations, but the moral gap is gigantic.


That's very very different than ruining the journo"s life.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: