>Wikipedia functions worst, IMHO, for politicized issues.
It still functions better than most major news outlets do. Usually the only time I see an article that is very heavily slanted is when it the pet issue of some particular group or cause (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_United_Sta... )
Its rules on sources aren't bad at all, it's just implementation which is a bit dodgy sometimes.
It still functions better than most major news outlets do. Usually the only time I see an article that is very heavily slanted is when it the pet issue of some particular group or cause (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_United_Sta... )
Its rules on sources aren't bad at all, it's just implementation which is a bit dodgy sometimes.