Because from my perspective, there's more than enough accumulated capital / lobbying / entrenched market positions to make disruption of the market a pipe dream.
In that case, I consider slapping "too burdensome" regulations and then later parring them down the lesser of two evils.
Is or isn't internet access important enough to be treated as a utility? That's what Title II asks in my opinion.
If so, then sort out the implementation details later.
(Disclaimer: In a semi-related note, I support the ACA for the same reasons. Is universal health insurance important enough to codify in law? If so, work on the details after you get that point down on paper.)
Because from my perspective, there's more than enough accumulated capital / lobbying / entrenched market positions to make disruption of the market a pipe dream.
In that case, I consider slapping "too burdensome" regulations and then later parring them down the lesser of two evils.
Is or isn't internet access important enough to be treated as a utility? That's what Title II asks in my opinion.
If so, then sort out the implementation details later.
(Disclaimer: In a semi-related note, I support the ACA for the same reasons. Is universal health insurance important enough to codify in law? If so, work on the details after you get that point down on paper.)