I'm curious how quickly the company's manpower model already progresses people from entry levels to more productive and higher paid roles. Can they do this by making their people more productive, and thus worth more in the labor market or as part of the company? And if so, how are they going to do that? That's a workforce-led business model: We're going to provide value in the market place by taking people and training them up to do productive stuff for customers. We're basically investing in training people to enhance their productivity.
So what would be really interesting is if Gravity were to say, if we've got people stuck at entry level after two years, then we're doing something wrong and we've got figure out how to grow them better.
That is a model that all managements and investors would want to emulate. And then you're paying people more not out of noblesse oblige but because they are literally empowered to go make more. It's a much better model, economically and morally, than CEOs and investors paying more because they're such great people.
Probably most profitable and growing companies are already doing this to one degree or another. Your best workforce strategy is finding good people and then making them better.
So what would be really interesting is if Gravity were to say, if we've got people stuck at entry level after two years, then we're doing something wrong and we've got figure out how to grow them better.
That is a model that all managements and investors would want to emulate. And then you're paying people more not out of noblesse oblige but because they are literally empowered to go make more. It's a much better model, economically and morally, than CEOs and investors paying more because they're such great people.
Probably most profitable and growing companies are already doing this to one degree or another. Your best workforce strategy is finding good people and then making them better.