Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wind farm would have to be about 30 times bigger than area taken by nuclear plant. Solar farm -- about 15 times [1]. Renewables definitely take more land. But there's no shortage of land in most places in the world. Shortage of arable land? Sure. But not land in general. E.g. all US energy demand could be met by covering a small fraction of Arizona deserts with solar panels. Solar and wind could also be located offshore.

[1] http://wilderness.org/sites/default/files/legacy/Website-Lan...



People will argue with you, "What about transmission losses?"

Transmission losses are ~6%. Build more renewables.


And you can still use the arable land under a wind farm.


Solar farms in temperate regions can be mounted higher to let animals graze below them, assuming you don't stick them on an existing roof.


They'll still reduce the amount of sunlight plants under them receive. Not sure the side-effects are negligible.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: