Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I always just assumed it was mostly because of the desire to have a proprietary system he could generate revenue out of, instead of wading into GPL-esque territory that tends to go along with LISP.

It's also one of the main reasons I have been using Octave and Python/Anaconda.



It was first released a year before the GPL.

One thing I'm sure was very significant was an IP fight with his institution, Caltech, which prompted him resigning in 1983, the same year RMS gave up on Lisp Machines and started the GNU project.


Most proper Lisps are all proprietary, what GPL scheme?

None of the GPL Lisps compare to what is offered by the likes of Allegro Common Lisp and similar environments.


> None of the GPL Lisps compare to what is offered by the likes of Allegro Common Lisp and similar environments.

Care to elaborate?


Allegro Common Lisp, Franz Lisp provide IDE tooling reminiscent of the Lisp Machines. With visual debuggers, graphical REPL, hypertext documentation triggered from the REPL, libraries to integrate with the OS....

Additionally their optimising compilers are quite good.


Didn't realize, the only LISP I regularly interact with is emacs lisp...




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: